Dan Gay writes:
"Thinking about methodology – how methods are selected and applied –
is important when practising development economics. Economists are far
too reluctant to question their underlying methodology, preferring to
think of the discipline as a standardised approach rather than a toolkit
or a process of enquiry using ideas from other social sciences like
social and political theory. The discipline probably doesn’t carry the
same scientific status as the natural sciences, and it should be a lot
more modest.
Reflexivity means in part a process of critical self-examination,
involving reflection on outside influences as well as the specific
peculiarities of a situation. Maybe development economics itself should
become more case-study based, empirical and context-orientated instead
of so often applying theories based on deductive modelling?"
I would be quite interested to see some examples of the successful use of ethnographic methods to address economic questions and concerns. There seems to be a lot of suggestion in the economics world today about the potential rewards to be reaped from broadening economic methodology, but it is hard to come across examples of economists actually doing this.
No comments:
Post a Comment